
Many people see the soul as a ghostly thing that lives within our body. What is our soul? It has been described as our spirit and deeper purpose. What’s a better way to describe it?
A more flexible way to describe the soul is: The organizing center of your experience.
It is the pattern that makes “you” the same subject across changing thoughts, moods, and life chapters.
Why call it the “organizing center”?
Instead of treating the soul as a ghostly “thing,” this language points to a dynamic process:
- It is the immaterial pattern that holds together your memories, values, character traits, and style of perceiving the world.
- It is what gives your life a felt orientation—toward truth, beauty, relationship, achievement, service, etc.—rather than just a collection of disconnected goals.
- It is the bridge between your conscious and unconscious life, the place where images, intuitions, and longings gradually shape who you become.
In that sense, “soul” is less an invisible object and more the deep configuration of your being.
Alternative phrases you might like to call the soul
Each of these captures a different nuance:
- “Deep organizing pattern of my life” – emphasizes structure and continuity rather than mysticism.
- “Inner center of experience and meaning-making” – aligns with psychological language about identity and purpose.
- “Living essence that gives my life its particular tone” – highlights the qualitative feel (your way of loving, suffering, creating).
For philosophical or psychological reasons, you might say something like:
“By ‘soul’ I mean the enduring inner center that organizes my experiences, values, and desires into a coherent sense of self and purpose.”
That keeps the depth people associate with “spirit and deeper purpose” while staying intelligible in secular, philosophical, and psychological contexts.
In practice, there is a three-part soul model and is a way of diagnosing and training your inner life by noticing which “voice” is in charge and then reordering them. How does the three-part soul model work in practice?
The three parts, briefly
In the Platonic version (and many modern spiritual-psychological riffs on it), the parts are:
- Rational (or higher) part: seeks truth, coherence, long‑term good; plans, reflects, and asks “What is actually wise here?”
- Spirited part: carries pride, anger, courage, honor, the drive to stand up for what matters; it’s your inner “fighter.”
- Appetitive (or lower) part: wants comfort, pleasure, security; food, sex, status, scrolling, buying, etc.
In more contemporary three-part models you often see a similar structure reframed as Higher Self / Middle Self / Lower Self, or Superego / Ego / Id.
How it “works” moment to moment
In a concrete situation, you can ask:
- What is my appetitive part wanting right now? (Comfort, relief, dopamine.)
- What is my spirited part wanting? (To win, to be respected, to defend, to prove something.)
- What is my rational/higher part seeing? (The larger pattern, long‑term consequences, my values.)
Example: You’re exhausted and angry after a bad day.
- Appetitive: “Let’s binge junk food, doomscroll, and skip sleep.”
- Spirited: “I’ll show them—I’ll fire off a rage email, fantasize about quitting, prove I’m right.”
- Rational: “I’m depleted; what I actually need is rest, a boundary, and a plan to address this tomorrow.”
Using the model in practice means: you name each impulse, recognize they are parts rather than the whole of you, and then deliberately let the rational/higher part choose the response.
Training the “alliances”
The model isn’t just about reason suppressing desire; it’s about recruiting the spirited part to support the rational part against unwise appetites.
In practice that looks like:
- Letting your spirited side feel honor in keeping a difficult promise, not just in “winning.”
- Turning pride toward your values: “I am the kind of person who doesn’t send drunk texts,” “I take pride in telling the truth even when it costs me.”
- Giving the appetites a rightful place: enough sleep, food, pleasure, and play that they don’t need to hijack everything.
Then “courage” (spirit) becomes an ally of wisdom, not just of ego; your body and desires are cared for but not allowed to drive the car.
Using it as a self‑coaching tool
Ways this shows up practically:
- Journaling: “In this conflict, what did my appetites want? What did my pride/spirit want? What did my wiser self see?”
- Decision-making: Before a big choice, explicitly consult each part—then let the rational/higher part integrate them.
- Habit change: When you fail at a habit, instead of “I’m weak,” you can say, “My appetitive part overwhelmed my rational part last night; how can I recruit my spirited part (pride, commitment, social support) to help next time?”
The power of the model is that it turns inner chaos into a negotiation between identifiable voices, with the task of life being to educate them and bring them into a more intelligent hierarchy rather than letting any one part rule blindly.
What are real-life examples of three-part soul model conflicts?
Here are some concrete, everyday patterns where the three-part soul model clashes inside a person—reason vs. spirit vs. appetite.
1. Diet, cravings, and self‑respect
- Appetitive: “I want the whole pizza; I deserve this, I’m stressed.”
- Rational: “If I do this again, my energy, sleep, and health will tank; I said I’d cut back.”
- Spirited: can go either way—“Screw it, nobody tells me no” (joining appetite) or “I’m better than breaking my promise again” (allying with reason).
The conflict is not just “pizza vs no pizza,” but “short‑term comfort” vs “long‑term well‑being and self‑respect,” with spirit deciding whether it’s proud of restraint or proud of rebellion.
2. Toxic relationship you won’t leave
- Appetitive: “I don’t want to be alone; I want the sex, the familiarity, the shared history.”
- Rational: “This is abusive/eroding me; this pattern won’t change; staying wastes years.”
- Spirited: “I refuse to be someone who ‘fails’ at relationships” or “I’m loyal; I don’t give up,” which can keep you stuck; or alternatively, “I’m done tolerating disrespect; I’m walking.”
Here the conflict is between comfort and fear of loss, a clear appraisal of harm, and a pride/honor system that may be attached to “sticking it out” even when it’s self‑betrayal.
3. Career: golden handcuffs vs vocation
- Appetitive: “Stay. The salary, status, and lifestyle are too good to risk.”
- Rational: “In 10 years I’ll be burned out and regret never trying meaningful work.”
- Spirited: “People admire me here; quitting feels like losing status” or “I want to be the kind of person who risks comfort for integrity.”
The inner struggle is between security, long‑term coherence with your values, and a drive for honor/recognition that might defend either staying or leaving.
4. Speaking up vs staying safe
Imagine seeing something unethical at work.
- Appetitive: “Stay quiet; keep your job, avoid awkwardness, avoid being targeted.”
- Rational: “If this continues, people are harmed; policies and my own values say I should report it.”
- Spirited: “I want to be courageous and just” vs “I don’t want to look difficult or be disliked.”
This is a classic courage case: spirit can become moral bravery in service of reason, or social anxiety and desire for approval in service of appetite.
5. Addiction and relapse
- Appetitive: “Use the substance; you’ll feel relief right now; you can deal with consequences later.”
- Rational: “Relapse will wreck my body, relationships, and goals; I know exactly how this ends.”
- Spirited: “I’m tired of being ‘the addict’; I want to be proud of my sobriety” or “It’s hopeless anyway, I’m that person, might as well lean into it.”
The battle is intense because appetitive desire and withdrawal pain are strong, and spirit can either fuel shame and giving up, or righteous anger and resolve: “I will not be ruled by this.”
6. Creative work vs procrastination
- Appetitive: “Let’s scroll, snack, and check notifications; starting the project feels uncomfortable.”
- Rational: “If I do 90 focused minutes, I’ll make real progress and reduce long‑term stress.”
- Spirited: “I’m an artist/pro; I take my craft seriously”—or “I don’t want to face possible failure; better to avoid and protect my ego.”
Here spirit often shows up as perfectionism (protecting honor) that sides with appetite (avoidance) against reason’s modest, doable plan.
How to resolve tripartite soul conflicts in daily life
In daily life, you “resolve” tripartite soul conflicts by (1) noticing which part is speaking, (2) re‑establishing reason as the guide, and (3) training spirit and appetite into healthier roles over time.
1. Name the three voices in the moment
When you feel torn, quickly label each pull:
- “What does my appetitive side want right now?” (comfort, pleasure, escape).
- “What does my spirited side want?” (to win, be respected, prove something, defend myself).
- “What is my rational side actually saying?” (truth, long‑term good, coherence with my values).
Simply naming them already creates a bit of distance so you’re less fused with whichever impulse is loudest.
2. Let reason choose, not just react
Plato’s basic practical rule: reason should rule, spirit should be its ally, and appetite should be guided—not in charge.
So you ask:
- “If my rational part were in charge, what would it decide for my long‑term good here?”
- “What is the smallest concrete action that enacts that decision in the next 10 minutes?” (Send an apology, close the app, prep real food, step away from the argument.)
You’re not killing desire or emotion; you’re putting them under a deliberated plan.
3. Recruit spirit to support reason
Conflicts resolve more easily when spirit (pride, courage, love of honor) fights alongside reason instead of with appetite.
You can consciously:
- Reframe the rational choice as honorable: “Keeping this boundary is what a self‑respecting person does,” “It’s courageous to leave this situation.”
- Attach identity to the rational path: “I’m the kind of person who keeps this promise / tells the truth / doesn’t send rage‑texts.”
This channels the same energy that wants victory or recognition into moral courage rather than ego defense.
4. Give appetites a rightful place, not the throne
Trying to crush appetite completely tends to backfire; the goal is ordered satisfaction, at the right time, in the right way.
In practice:
- Plan legitimate pleasures (food, rest, sex, play) so they don’t have to hijack you impulsively.
- Use your rational part to set “enough”: how much is health‑promoting vs self‑sabotaging.
- When urges spike, recognize: “This is my appetitive part yelling; I don’t have to obey immediately,” and delay with a small rule (“If I still want it in 15 minutes, I’ll reconsider”).
This respects the part that seeks comfort and survival while keeping it subordinate to the whole self’s good.
5. Build habits that keep the soul ordered
The more you practice, the less dramatic the conflicts become.
Useful daily practices:
- Brief review at night: “Where did appetite rule today? Where did spirit overreact? Where did reason lead well?”
- Implementation intentions: “If I feel the urge to X (scroll, snap, binge), I will pause and name the three parts before acting.”
- Virtue focus: Pick one virtue linked to each part and train it for a week (wisdom for reason, courage for spirit, temperance for appetite).
Let’s walk through exactly how to run this three‑part process on emotional control with script language you can use on your own.
You can turn the tree-part soul process into an emotional‑control practice by training each part—reason, spirit, and appetite—to play its proper role in the moment you’re triggered. Here’s how:
1. “Name the parts” drill (when you feel a surge)
Use this whenever you notice anger, anxiety, or craving spike.
- Pause for 10–30 seconds.
- Silently name each voice:
- Decide: “I will let reason decide, and spirit will back it up; appetite can wait.”
Doing this repeatedly builds self‑awareness and reduces how quickly an emotion hijacks you.
2. Recruiting spirit to cool anger
Plato sees spirit (thymos) as the emotional center for anger, shame, and pride, and as reason’s natural ally when educated.
Try this in conflict:
- Step back and ask: “What would be honorable here, not just satisfying?”
- Let spirit take pride in self‑command: “I’m not the person who screams or sends rage texts; I protect my dignity.”
- Channel the energy into a rational act: writing a calm message, setting a boundary, or walking away instead of escalating.
You are not suppressing emotion; you’re redirecting its force into behavior that reason endorses.
3. Temperance reps: training appetite
Appetite responds to pleasure and pain and can be reshaped by consistent patterns.
Practical exercises:
- Pre‑commitment: Decide in advance simple rules—e.g., “No replies while angry,” “No phone in bedroom,” “One drink max on weeknights.”
- Delayed gratification reps: When a strong urge hits, practice “not now, maybe later” for 10–15 minutes; often the intensity drops.
- Reward the ordered choice: Give yourself small, wholesome pleasures (walk, music, good food) when you follow reason, so appetite learns that alignment with reason also leads to satisfaction.
Over time, the appetitive part becomes easier to guide, not because it disappears, but because its habits change.
4. Daily harmony practice (short evening review)
Since harmony of the parts is Plato’s picture of inner justice, a brief review strengthens emotional regulation over time.
At night, jot 3–5 lines:
- “Where did appetite run the show today?” (e.g., mindless eating, scrolling).
- “Where did spirit overreact or help?” (e.g., defensiveness vs courage).
- “Where did reason lead, and how did that feel afterward?”
End with one specific adjustment for tomorrow—“Next time I feel X, I’ll do the name‑the‑parts drill first”—to slowly re‑educate the soul.
5. A simple protocol for strong emotions
When you feel overwhelmed (rage, panic, craving), you can run a compact sequence:
- Stabilize the body: slow breaths or grounding to quiet appetite’s raw urgency.
- Name the parts: “Appetite wants… Spirit feels… Reason knows…,” as above.
- Honor plus prudence: Ask, “What would be both wise and honorable right now?” and act on that, even in a tiny step.
You can use a specific emotional pattern you’re dealing with (e.g., jealousy, shame, conflict avoidance), and turn it into a tailored micro‑routine to overcome obstacles that are hindering success in areas of your life.
Related content:
- The Soul: The Organizing Center of Your Experience
- The Psychology of The Science Of Getting Rich by Wallace Wattles
- How To Truly Motivate Yourself To Do Anything
- The Psychology of Guilt Corrects, Shame Withdraws: Why This Distinction Changes Everything
- The Unexpected Power of What We Say: A Reflection on “Hung by the Tongue”